Monday, February 28, 2011

Bernie Madoff, SEC, John Chamber & Warren Buffett

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Bernie Madoff Is Telling the Truth About SEC
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:39:12 -0800
From: Jas Jain

Bernie Madoff Is Telling the Truth About SEC

He is rightly accusing SEC of its culpability in not investigating crooks that run Goldchain Silverknife and JPM. As I have been pointing out for more than a dozen years, SEC = Securing Entitlements for Crooks. Among the long list of Crooks is John Chambers. Ever since I identified CSCO as a Scam, shareholders have made Zippo and crooks have cash out bet. $150-200B! System of the Crooks is functioning very efficiently.

The Scam Market exists for its intended function as as the SEC. One can see why it was a necessity to breed Americans into dopes. Among the biggest born-and-bred American dopes is none other than Warren Buffett.

Jas

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Las Vegas Housing “push the median sale price down to a nearly 15-year low of $118,000”


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Las Vegas… "push the median sale price down to a nearly 15-year low of $118,000"
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:39:44 -0800
From: Jas Jain

This is coming to a zip code near you when the economy can no longer be supported by artificial boost from the Feds (USG & Fed. Reserve). It would take another Scam Market crash for the ritzy areas in Silly.con Valley. Be patient, the prices in Palo Alto and Los Altos would be down more than 80% from the peak. I know that it is hard for Scam lovers to believe.

Jas

PS: Prices have hit new lows in 80% of the metros in the US. It is also true of the majority of zip codes in CA. This is despite a recovery in the economy and a big recovery in the Scam Market.

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

http://www.dqnews.com/Articles/2011/News/Las-Vegas/RRCLNV110224.aspx

 

Las Vegas Metro Area January Home Sales

Las Vegas region January home sales fell as they normally do from December but rose nearly 10 percent above a year ago to the highest level for that month in four years. The portion of homes sold to investors and others paying cash was at record levels, creating especially robust sales in the sub-$100,000 market. That helped push the median sale price down to a nearly 15-year low of $118,000, a real estate information service reported.

A total of 3,669 new and resale houses and condos closed escrow in the Las Vegas-Paradise metro area (Clark County) last month – the highest for a January since 2007. Last month's sales tally was down 20.8 percent from December but up 9.9 percent from a year earlier, according to DataQuick Information Systems of San Diego. The firm tracks real estate trends nationally via public property records.

On average, the region's sales have fallen 24.2 percent between December and January since 1994, when DataQuick's complete Las Vegas region statistics begin.

January's sales total was 2.4 percent above the average for January sales since 1994. Last month's year-over-year sales increase was the first in seven months.

Sales of homes priced below $100,000 rose to 38.6 percent of all transactions last month, up from 36.6 percent in December and 35.1 percent a year ago. Last month's figure was the highest for sub-$100,000 sales since the housing downturn began.

And it's no wonder: Absentee buyers, which are mainly investors, purchased 49.2 percent of all Las Vegas–area homes sold in January – the highest level since at least 2000. Last month's figure was up from 45.9 percent in December and 43.0 percent a year ago. Absentee buyers paid a median $100,000 last month, down from $102,819 in December and $101,000 a year earlier.

Absentee buyers can include second-home purchasers and others who, for various reasons, indicate at the time of sale that the property tax bill will go to a different address.

Those who appear to have used cash to purchase their homes accounted for 54.5 percent of total January sales – the highest in DataQuick's Las Vegas statistics back to 1994. Last month's level of all-cash purchases was up from 50.6 percent in December and 50.4 percent a year ago. The median price paid in these cash deals was $92,250 last month, up a bit from $89,250 in December but down from $96,000 a year earlier.

Specifically, these all-cash deals were transactions where there was no indication of a purchase mortgage recorded at the time of sale. Some of these "cash" buyers could have used alternative financing arrangements outside of a typical, recorded purchase mortgage, and in some cases they might be taking out mortgages after their purchases. All-cash deals have become popular in markets where prices have dropped sharply, luring investor buyers who can't always qualify for traditional mortgages. Moreover, sellers favor the relative speed and certainty of all-cash transactions.

The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos sold in the Las Vegas metro area last month fell to $118,000, down 4.8 percent from $124,000 in December and down 6.2 percent from $125,750 a year earlier. It was the fourth consecutive month in which the median fell year-over-year. Since the median hit a 2010 high of $139,000 last June, it has either declined or shown no change each month compared with a year earlier.

January's median was the lowest since it was also $118,000 in April 1996, and it was 62.2 percent below the peak $312,000 median in November 2006.

The median's recent decline to a nearly 15-year low can be attributed to several factors: price depreciation; robust sales of low-cost foreclosures; robust sales to investors, who mainly target low-cost properties; a hesitancy among potential buyers, who are waiting for clearer signs on the direction of the economy, home prices, and employment; lower-than-normal new-home sales (new homes tend to sell for more than resale homes); and higher-than-usual condo resales (condos tend to be the least expensive homes).

Sales of existing (not new) condos rose 20.6 percent last month from a year ago and represented a record 22.0 percent of all sales, compared with a 10-year average of 13.0 percent of sales. Last month's sales of newly built homes were the same as a year earlier but made up just 7.4 percent of total sales. That was the second-lowest level for any month in DataQuick's records and was well below the new-home market's historical monthly average of nearly 31 percent of all sales. Home builders have suffered amid the weak economy and competition from distressed sales.

The median price paid last month for resale single-family detached houses – the region's largest home-type category – was $125,000, down 3.8 percent from December and down 7.4 percent from $135,000 a year earlier. Last month's resale house median stood 60.0 percent below its peak of $312,250 in June 2006.

The median price paid for resale condos last month was $66,950, up 6.8 percent from December but down 3.0 percent from a year earlier. January's resale condo median was 67.0 percent below its $203,000 peak in July 2006.

An alternative price gauge – the median paid per square foot for resale single-family detached houses – dropped to $70 last month, which was the lowest since it was also $70 in April 1995. January's median paid per square foot was down 2.8 percent from December and down 7.9 percent from a year earlier, marking the fourth consecutive month to post a year-over-year decline. January's figure was 63.2 percent below the peak $190 paid per square foot in May and June of 2006.

Foreclosure resales – homes that had been foreclosed on in the prior 12 months – dipped slightly to 54.7 percent of the Las Vegas resale market last month. That was down from 56.3 percent in December and down from 62.0 percent a year earlier. Foreclosure resales peaked at 73.7 percent of the resale market in April 2009.

The number of homes foreclosed on in the Las Vegas region last month rose from both December and a year earlier. Lenders foreclosed on 2,658 single-family house and condo units in January, up 18.0 percent from December and up 59.4 percent from January 2010. The peak month was February 2009, which saw 3,718 foreclosures. The figures are based on the number of Trustees Deeds filed at the county recorder's office.

The foreclosure totals can include units that the county assessor has designated condos, but are currently used as apartments (e.g. a 100-unit complex designated as condos but used as apartments could be foreclosed on and those units would be reflected in the foreclosure total for that month). For this reason and others, the number of foreclosure filings has seesawed, and a single month's increase or decline doesn't necessarily indicate a new trend.

In January, a popular form of low-down-payment financing for first-time home buyers – government-insured FHA loans – accounted for 40.2 percent of all home purchase loans. That was down from 42.2 percent in December and down from 49.0 percent a year earlier.

Last month 4.4 percent of the homes sold had been "flipped," meaning they had sold twice on the open market in a six-month period. That was up from a flipping rate of 3.4 percent in December but down from 5.0 percent a year earlier. The region's flipping rate peaked in September 2004 at 8.9 percent.

Las Vegas-Paradise, NV

Number of sales

Jan-10

Dec-10

Jan-11

YOY %Chng

Resale houses

2,417

3,252

2,610

8.00%

Resale condos

675

972

814

20.60%

New homes

275

445

275

0.00%

All homes

3,367

4,669

3,699

9.90%

 

 

 

 

 

Median sale price

Jan-10

Dec-10

Jan-11

YOY %Chng

Resale houses

$135,000

$130,000

$125,000

-7.40%

Resale condos

$69,000

$62,700

$66,950

-3.00%

New homes

$201,515

$206,476

$207,000

2.70%

All homes

$125,750

$124,000

$118,000

-6.20%

 

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Geithner takes victory lap, claims financial system "much stronger" vs. before crisis

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Geithner takes victory lap, claims financial system "much stronger" vs. before crisis
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:17:41 -0800
From: Jas Jain


Jas: "The GAME would come to an end lot sooner that the Crooks and the dopes imagine."

 

AS: "I don't know.  What's going to force change?  It's hard to believe just how much corruption and thievery the majority are willing to tolerate.  You'd think the lack of a fair and CONstitutional response to the financial crisis would have led to massive protests.    The American people really are brainwashed. Seriously,  now that we've bailed out all the fraudsters and rich people we're suddenly supposed to start "worrying" about the deficit?   We can "afford" to bailout trillions in fraudulent and usurious credit but we can't "afford" social security?   What's even more mind boggling is that social security has been pre-funded with $2.5 trillion dollars to account for the wave of retiring baby boomers. If TPTB protect the purchasing power of the creditors (fraudulent credit no less), then they've got to squeeze it out of the wage earner.   Maybe that eventually wakes people up.    Who can say for sure?"

 

What's going to force the change? The exponential cost of keeping the GAME going. What were evildoer GW Bush's estimates of the future deficits? What were the actual deficits? When evildoer Obama took office, the economy had already been in recession for 14 months and the financial crisis was behind, thanks to the bailouts. What was his estimate of the deficit in 2012? $571B! What was his estimate a year ago and what is his estimate now and what would be his estimate a year from now? The cost of keeping the economy growing at an average rate of 2-3% a year is now 10% of the GDP. Two years from now it might be 12%. The gambler is playing a losing game with his cumulative losses rising exponentially. Such games always come to an abrupt end. Also, the only real winners seem to be the Crooks. After the election of 2010, evildoer Obama is sucking up to the Crooks and he would now focus on keeping the Crooks happy. A recipe for disaster.

Europeans are dealing with the debt problems and Amerika, controlled by a cabal that believes in pushing more debt, is making the problem worse because that is how it makes more money now and keeps its hold on power. Evildoers Bernanke and Obama have short-term orientation and they keep making the future prospects lot worse. These things always end badly and abruptly. Europeans have lot longer history to learn from than born-and-bred American dopes! American dopes take pride in not learning from the history of other empires and successful nations. They claim to be exceptional. They are no more exceptional than my ass. The mental problem is incurable without the aid of prolonged misery. On a secular, or organic, basis the US economy is already in the Greater Depression. After the artificial boost runs out it would become official.

Jas 

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Jas Jain on Geithner’s Gamble

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC: Geithner's Gamble
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:51:42 -0800
From: Jas Jain

FWC: Geithner's Gamble

Geither is part of the cabal that has death grip on the US economy and policymaking. He was very much part of the oversight gang, together with evildoers Greenspan and Bernanke, that allowed the crisis in the first place and now his job is to serve the bankers and financiers who had chosen him. What an amazing system that rewards those who caused the biggest crisis since the Great Depression. Under the control of the cabal the US economy is doomed. The cabal would keep sucking financial blood out of the economy and the working class as long as it is allowed to so. Obama is there to serve the cabal's economic policies and foreign policy.

Jas

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/johnson17/English

 

2011-02-22

 

Geithner's Gamble

LOS ANGELES – In a recent interview, United States Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner laid out his view of the nature of world economic growth and the role of the US financial sector. It is a deeply disturbing vision, one that amounts to a huge, uninformed gamble with the future of the American economy – and that suggests that Geithner remains the senior public official worldwide who is most in thrall to the self-serving ideology of big banks.

Geithner argues that the world will now experience a major "financial deepening," owing to growing demand in emerging markets for financial products and services. He is thinking, of course, of "middle-income" countries like India, China, and Brazil. And he is right to emphasize that all have made terrific progress and now offer great opportunities for the rising middle class, which wants to accumulate savings, borrow more easily (for productive investment, home purchases, education, etc), and, more generally, smooth out consumption.

But then Geithner takes a leap. He wants US banks to take the lead in these countries' financial development. His words are worth quoting at length:

"I don't have any enthusiasm for…trying to shrink the relative importance of the financial system in our economy as a test of reform, because we have to think about the fact that we operate in the broader world…It's the same thing for Microsoft or anything else. We want US firms to benefit from that…Now, financial firms are different because of the risk, but you can contain that through regulation."

There are three serious problems with this view. First, Geithner ignores everything that we know about the pattern of financial development around the world. It is very rare for financial systems to develop without major crises. In fact, experience in recent decades confirms what should have been obvious from previous centuries: as countries grow and accumulate savings, they become increasingly prone to financial collapse. Given Geithner's extensive international crisis-fighting experience at the US Treasury, the International Monetary Fund, and the New York Federal Reserve, his current naiveté on this point is simply stunning.

Second, Geithner assumes that risks at the largest US firms can be contained through regulation, when all our knowledge points directly to the contrary. Even the strongest supporters of the Dodd-Frank reform legislation emphasize that it only went part way towards reducing the incentives for major financial institutions to take big risks. Looking at the combined effect of the new law, plus the weak additional capital requirements agreed under Basel III and the hands-off approach already signaled by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (which Mr. Geithner chairs), it is hard to believe that anything has really improved.

In fact, given that our largest banks are now undoubtedly too big to fail, they have even more incentive to increase their debt levels relative to their equity. Higher leverage increases their payoffs when times are good – as executives and traders are paid based on their "return on equity." And when times are bad, for example in a crisis episode, losses are transferred to creditors. If those creditor losses are large and spread so as to undermine the broader financial system, pressure for a government bailout will mount. Bankers get the upside and taxpayers (and people laid off as credit is disrupted) get the downside.

The US financial sector went mad for high-risk loans to emerging markets during 1970s – arguing that this was the new frontier. This loan portfolio blew up in the debt crisis of 1982. A version of same thoughtless cross-border lending is again underway, extolled by leading financial sector executives (e.g., Jamie Dimon from JP Morgan Chase) – who have apparently persuaded Mr. Geithner to tag along intellectually.

And third, Geithner completely overlooks what has brought significant parts of Europe to its economic knees. He should spend more time with the authorities in Iceland or Ireland or Switzerland, countries where "financial globalization" allowed banks to become big relative to the economy.

 

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Hulbert, Richard Russell - Giving up on Dow Theory


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Hulbert, Richard Russell - Giving up on Dow Theory?
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 04:59:16 -0800
From: Jas Jain

Hulbert, Richard Russell - Giving up on Dow Theory?

Kevin: "This [Russell's admission of failure] is pretty amazing stuff."

Not for a born-and-bred American dope! Didn't I tell you years ago that the guy should be ignored? The dope completely failed to notice the change from the old stock market to the current Scam Market. What guide could the stock market before 1995 be in forecasting the current Scam Market? The Scam Market exists primarily for the benefit of the Crooks. The future of an econo-political system headed by evildoers is not difficult to forecast.

Jas
=================================================
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/investing-without-making-any-forecasts-2011-02-11

The best laid plans...

Commentary: Don't bet all or nothing on any adviser or system

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (MarketWatch) — Richard Russell made a remarkable confession earlier this week.

He said that he finds the financial markets to be so inscrutable that trying to time them is close to futile. He says that he's therefore decided to invest a good chunk of the accounts he manages in a mutual fund that has a static allocation to several uncorrelated asset classes.

Russell, of course, is the grandaddy of the investment advisory industry, having continuously published his Dow Theory Letters advisory service since 1958, more than 50 years ago. He has seen more bull and bear markets than almost any of the rest of us, and he has the cynicism that is borne of witnessing innumerable new strategies and approaches that have come onto the investment scene to great fanfare and then ultimately failed.

As an illustration of the mixed and divergent signals the market is sending, Russell writes: "I recently read the works of A. Gary Shilling and Bob Prechter's Elliott Wave Forecast, and they provide really convincing reasons as to why we're going into deflation. I read Larry Edelson and a dozen other advisors and they provide excellent reasons why we're heading into hyperinflation."

I sympathize with Russell's argument. As fate would have it, I read his comments while at the World Money Show in Orlando, where I will be giving a couple of workshops. After listening to some of the other workshops at this conference, I was convinced that I'd be a fool to have any exposure whatsoever to the equity markets. Upon listening to other workshops, in contrast, I concluded that I should mortgage the house to put everything into the stock market.

Unfortunately, examining these advisers' track records goes only so far in helping us decide which of these viewpoints is correct. Even among the advisers with the very best long-term performances, there still is widespread disagreement.
...

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Michael Scheuer On Osama bin Laden


==> See "ECRI's Growth Prediction Proves True"

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Michael Scheuer On Osama bin Laden
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:47:27 -0800
From: Jas Jain


Michael Scheuer On Osama bin Laden

I listened to Michael Scheuer ("Scheuer served in the CIA for 22 years before resigning in 2004. He was chief of the Osama bin Laden unit at the Counterterrorist Center from 1996 to 1999.") and he enumerated qualities, or virtues, of Osama bin Laden (I think nine). Based on his character assessment, Arab Muslims have a far superior moral leader in Osama bin Laden than do Americans in the latest power-hungry GW Bush and Obama (they are vain and morally bankrupt). No wonder that America is in trouble. A bad system brings to power only corrupt and immoral leaders and guarantees bad outcomes, long-term.

This also applies to India. Democracies' decades are numbered, as in one or two. India would be the first big one to collapse, most likely in 2010s. Japanese, with their superior culture and location, would fare by far the best. East Asian countries, in general, would do better. There is lot more to a good social organization than democracy! Blind faith is a terrible afflication!

Jas
--    

Friday, February 4, 2011

Andrew Leonard Behavioral Economics and America’s Future - Jas Jain Commentary


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Behavioral Economics and America's Future
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:10:48 -0800
From: Jas Jain


Behavioral Economics and America's Future

My approach to forecasting the future of the US economy and the political system is based on my conclusive observations on the behavior of three important classes—masses (populace who supposedly are the masters of this country!), ruling elite (economic and political, supposedly servants of the public and the sharecroppers, but in practice their masters) and the priestly class (who determines what is wrong and what is right in the moral terms and this class is dominated by trained economists). Today's links from A Neo-Keynesian Economist's Blog :

·               AIG CEO: Liberals are deadbeats - Andrew Leonard

"Deadbeats" are a result of the worst welfare system in the world (not the most socialistic) and CEOs are certifiable crooks and the enemies of the working folk, but they control the political system as a result of dollar-o-cracy (one dollar = one vote!). Everything is upside down—dopes who are economic slaves claim to be masters of the country and supposed servants are the masters. The true characterization of the three classes, as it exists in America presently, is:

 

1. Masses are irremediable born-and-bred dopes.

2. Ruling elite is recruited from crooks and evildoers, including born-and-bred evildoers like Bernanke and Krooksman. The latter learned nothing but evil schemes of manipulating the economy.

3. The priestly class consists of propagandists, e.g., Limbaugh, and evildoers, e.g., Krooksman. Needless to say that born-and-bred American dopes are clueless as to whom to believe. Invariably, they fall victim to seasoned propagandists.

 

In response to a reply on my forecast of probable election of an American Hitler (most likely in 2016 or 2020 election), please remember that what we have in America now are not Hilters but financial crooks and economic evildoers; the American Hitler would be a "blood would conquer money" kind of guy. Most Americans don't understand the difference between a Hitler and financial crooks and economic evildoers. German Hitler was a predictable outcome of the evil deeds of Anglo-American financial crooks. What is happening in Egypt is the latest proof of America having been a rogue nation since 1917. Germans were victims of wickedness of American and British business crooks! Born-and-bred American dopes are only taught the propaganda version of the history of 1914-1945. Chickens would come home to roost. Sooner than one would wish.

Jas

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Egypt's Revolution: Coming to an Economy Near You


Article:  Growing Up Without A Cell Phone - A Look at Change


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC: Egypt's Revolution: Coming to an Economy Near You
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:48:18 -0800
From: Jas Jain

Egypt's Revolution: Coming to an Economy Near You

Especially, for born-and-bred American dopes. These dopes believe that the System of the Crooks (business elite), since mid-1990s, and the Era of the Evildoers (in political power, since 1981) would continue to go on. Either there would be a military coup (5-10%) or massive violence in the streets (10-15%) once the Greater Depression can't be postponed by borrow-and-spend policies of the Federal Reserve and the politicians, or there would be election of the American Hitler (75-85% chance). A CHANGE is definitely coming to Amerika to overthrow the Crooks and the Evildoers once they can no longer keep the game (screwing the public by brainwashing) going. Crooks and Evildoers would escape and dopes would suffer. No surprise there.

Jas

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

http://blogs.hbr.org/haque/2011/02/egypts_revolution_is_coming_to.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+harvardbusiness%2Fhaque+%28Umair+Haque+on+HBR.org%29

Egypt's Revolution: Coming to an Economy Near You

4:58 PM Tuesday February 1, 2011

by Umair Haque

 

It was a society in stagnation, if not decline. Despite ostensible stability, its people — especially its young people — faced a future bleaker than the dark side of Pluto. For decades, the richest grew even richer, as national debt mounted, middle-class people tried to make ends meet, and upward mobility fell. Government failed to address these problems, and the governed felt increasingly disenfranchised — and partisan. Mass unemployment metastasized from a temporary illness to a chronic condition. One of its major cities decided to erect a permanent tent city, for a permanently excluded, marginalized underclass.
This isn't Tunisia, or Egypt — but America. Yes, in many ways Egypt and America couldn't be more different. But the broad contours are just a little too similar for comfort.
Consider a tweet that made the rounds this weekend. "Youth unemployment: #Yemen 49%, #Palestine 38%, #Morocco 35%, #Egypt 33%, #Tunisia 26%". It sounds staggering. But youth unemployment rates are 20-40% across Europe. And in the USA, estimates range from 20-50% depending on how you count, and when. Egypt's youth unemployment crisis — which many seemed to think on Twitter was merely an Arab problem (oh, those Arabs!) is, in point of fact, a global one.
What we're watching is a massive malfunctioning of the global economy. At the root of the problem: dumb growth. Dumb growth is, in many ways, bogus — rather than reflecting enduring wealth creation, it largely reflects the transfer of wealth: from the poor to the rich, the young to the old, tomorrow to today, and human beings to corporate "people." Dumb growth is growth without prosperity. And it's far from an Egyptian problem.
Lane Kenworthy has recently called America's version of it "the Great Decoupling." In the US, net worth, median income, job creation, happiness — all have been flat for a decade (plus). Other measures of prosperity, which I'd argue matter more, haven't just flatlined, they've cratered: polls show that trust, connection, stability, social mobility, are all down. The problem of dumb, empty "growth" is global.
And my hunch is that it's going to get worse, before it gets better. Consider the food, commodity, and energy price spikes likely to sweep the globe this year. Consider the costs of climate disruption. If it's bad for a family whose breadwinner is unemployed in the States, how bad is it for the more than three billion people — that's more than half the world, folks — living on less than $2 a day?
How do we fix it? In his new book, Tyler Cowen argues that the problem is that that we've eaten all the "low-hanging fruit," — that there's not a great enough quantity of innovation. That's a sharp insight, but I'd argue (in my own new book) that the problem's slightly different: not a high enough quality of innovation. The challenge now is leaping to a higher order of innovation: institutional innovation, because it's institutions that set the incentives that mold and shape human achievement in the first place.

And for far too many people, yesterday's economic institutions are literally not delivering the goods.
Yes, the tools of capitalism have lifted entire nations out of poverty. But for decades, real prosperity has been flat. Now, at a macroeconomic level, our current economic institutions simply transfer prosperity upwards, to the richest 10% --> 1% --> 0.1% --> 0.01% and so on. This is what I call a global "ponziconomy" — a titanic, gleaming whirling, wealth transfer machine. And we can't fix it with the same tools we used to build it. That's why it's never been more vital for us — we, the people — to challenge the institutions of yesteryear.
All of which brings me back to Egypt as the canary in a very large coal mine. It's hard to overstate just how unexpected a transformation is occurring in Egypt. Death, taxes, and Hosni Mubarak — they were the three great certainties in modern Egyptian life.
But just underneath the surface, the tectonic pressure of dumb growth was steadily mounting. Bogus prosperity's like magma, filling the volcanic chamber of a society: you can bottle it up for only so long before it erupts, and spectacularly. Today, the world's gaze is fixed on the pyroclastic flow: never-ending demonstrations, protests, people self-organizing in a state that has shut down the internet, mobile networks, and public transport. But the fault lines underneath this explosion were laid down decades ago — and they might just run across the globe.
The lesson: You can't steal the future forever — and, in a hyperconnected world, you probably can't steal as much of it for as long.
Now, I don't think Americans will take to the streets to oust their government. The challenge of the democratic, developed world is a quieter rebellion: against a bankruptcy not just of the pocketbook, but of meaning. It's not to take a stand against a dictator, but to take a stand against an unenlightened, nihilistic, hyperconsumerist, soul-suckingly unfulfilling, lethally short-termist ethos that inflicts real and relentless damage on people, society, the natural world, and future generations.
If we want to deliver the goods — enduring, meaningful stuff that engenders real prosperity — we're probably going to have start with delivering them to one another. Our untrammeled path back to prosperity — should we choose to blaze it — is millions of personal revolutions made up of billions of tiny choices that reclaim our humanity from the heartless merchants of indifference, fear, anger, and vanity.
Some say it's i




Suggested Reading


=>Article: How to Get the Best CD Rates
=>Article: Beware of Annuities
=>Info: Best Mortgage Loan Rates