Saturday, July 31, 2010

Top CD Rates

The top CD annal percentage yield (APY) this week (July 9) is at Pentagon Federal Credit Union for a 7-year certificate of deposit currently paying 3.51%.   From my survey of six months ago, this same certificate was paying 4.5%! 

The table below shows the best CD rates for other terms. If that table is hard to read, then try Very Best CD Rates.


"Highest CD Rate Survey + Current US Treasury Rates"
TermJuly 9, 2010 Highest
Rate (APY)
Where?
(Click link for Full Rate Sheets)
Vanguard Daily
0.09%
Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund
Vanguard Tax Exempt
0.11%
Vanguard Tax Exempt Money Market Fund
FDIC Daily Savings
1.40%
Best Savings Account Rate Survey 
6 Month CD
1.23%
Aurora Bank 
1 Year CD
1.55%
Sallie Mae Bank & 1.50%@ Discover Bank 
1 Yr US Treasury
0.29%
US Treasury Rate Quote
18 - Month CD
1.71%
 Aurora Bank 
2 Year CD
2.00%
Stonebridge Bank & Bank of Internet USA
3 Year CD
2.50%
 newDominionDIRECT 
4 Year CD
2.92%
 Bank of Internet USA
5 Year CD
3.06%
Astoria Federal Savings Bank
5 Yr US Treasury
1.83%
US Treasury Rate Quote
7 Year CD
3.51%
Pentagon Federal CU aka PenFed 
10 Year CD
3.50%
Discover Bank
10 Yr US Treasury
3.04%
US Treasury Rate Quote
Vanguard Money Market Rates shown for Reference  

With rates so low, banks will try to sell you their annuity products. Make sure you read my article: Beware of Annuities

Historical CD Rates: 
Click charts to see full size images


1-Month CD Daily Chart
6-Month Certificate of Deposit Historical Chart
6-Month CD Daily Chart
6-Month Certificate of Deposit Historical Chart

Related information:

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Fwd: Round Trip: Most of Gold and Silver From S. America Found Its Way to India Until 1750 and Some Back to N. America by 1950!



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Round Trip: Most of Gold and Silver From S. America Found Its Way to India Until 1750 and Some Back to N. America by 1950!
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:46:25 -0700
From: Jas Jain

Round Trip: Most of Gold and Silver From S. America Found Its Way to India Until 1750 and Some Back to N. America by 1950!

 

From The Indian Ocean by Michael Pearson:

"…the Europeans still had to send out large quantities of bullion into the Indian Ocean area; few European products found markets in the area. As Fulber noted, "if silver had not been available to Europeans in sufficient quantities, the East India trade could not have been carried on. This in turn reinforces our view of a world that is beginning to be integrated, for the bullion came from South America, and much of it flowed on to the Indian Ocean, either via the Mediterranean and the Middle East and so to our ocean, or around the cape in European ships. On average two-thrids of VOC [Dutch East India Company] exports from Europe were in bullion; in the seventeenth century the Peruvian silver, in the eighteenth Brazilian gold. Between 1660 and 1720 Dutch imports into Benagl, one of their major trading areas, were only 12.5 per cent goods, and the rest being bullion. So also with EIC [English East India Company]. Over the period 1660-1720 only 20.6 per cent of the English imports to all of Asia were made up of goods; the rest was bullion.

 

Most rulers at this time, whether English kings or Mogul emperors, were billionists who believed, with prevailing economic thought, that a rich state was one which had huge stocks of precious metals… The consequences of the discovery of the Americas, and then of huge silver deposits there, generated bullion without which Europeans could hardly have entered Indian Ocean trade. The ramifications of this are clearly enormous."

 

After the British take over of India beginning in late 1700s and other European colonization of Asia some of the bullion found its way back to Europe and some of it later to the US. Thus, part of the gold from S. America made almost a round trip. The Hindu goddess of wealth, Laxmi, likes to travel around. My guess is that most of the gold in Fort Knox was mined after 1750.

 

However, the US dollar is the "bullion" of the global trade today. Who own most of the US dollars?! If you want to see the countries on the rise and the countries on decline just look at who were the largest creditor nations and who were the largest debtor nations for the past two hundred years. The advantage keeps moving towards the creditor nations. The two largest creditor nations in recent history, the UK and the US, are now the largest debtor nations. Consumption debt hangs like a heavy stone around the neck. A born-and-bred American dope like Warren Buffett, with his narrow-minded and parochial views, simply cannot understand why the next 50-100 years for the US cannot be anything like the last 50-100 years. America is in a long decline, because of a bad economic system developed over the past three decades, which would end in a political catastrophe. I say, good riddance to the System of the Crooks, by the Crooks and for the Crooks. Unfortunately, lot of innocent people would die because of the unpunished fraudulent activities of American Crooks that simply cannot be stopped by the current system, it seems. A bad system leads to a bad outcome! I am sure that copycat crooks in India are doing the same—Pushing Debt and Scams. Dopes would get to experience the true nature of large "popular" and secular democracies.

Jas

Fwd: Re: A Wonderful History Book On Global Trade…

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: A Wonderful History Book On Global Trade…
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:05:42 -0700
From: Jas Jain

Jas, wealth and power have never been long permanent in any place.

...they travel over the face of the earth,

something like a caravan of merchants.

On their arrival, every thing is found green and fresh;

while they remain all is bustle and abundance,

and, when gone, all is left trampled down, barren, and bare.  - William Playfair

Incidentally, Playfair is credited as being the first to utilize various types of charts.  He also made a study of why some countries were unable to hold onto their wealth:

http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=195753&pageno=3

 

"If it is of importance to study by what means a nation may acquire wealth and power, it is not less so to discover by what means wealth and power, when once acquired, may be preserved… From this almost universal picture, we learn that the greatness of nations is but of short duration. We learn, also, that the state of a fallen people is infinitely more wretched and miserable than that of those who have never risen from their original state of poverty." (my emphasis)

 

Thanks, AS, for the reference. Preserving wealth is not something that a born-and-bred American dope spends much care on. A good example is Warren Buffett. Trust me, even with a much higher material standard of living a falling standard of living for a middle-class American family is lot more painful than a rising standard of living for much poorer middle-class families in China and India. Nothing can stop falling standard of living for the American middle-class. The Crooks have done the dirty deed and the fix is in. The fault of the American dopes is not recognizing the Crooks in time and then not be able to do anything about it. Political impotence is cause miserable of the American dope. Yeah, yeah, American dopes have a vote! Stupid people never can learn.

Jas

A Wonderful History Book On Global Trade That Gujratis and Jains Would be Very Proud Of

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: A Wonderful History Book On Global Trade That Gujratis and Jains Would be Very Proud Of
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:53:13 -0700
From: Jas Jain


A Wonderful History Book On Global Trade That Gujratis and Jains Would be Very Proud Of

When it comes to trade on the Indian Ocean the ports of Gujrat (a state in India on the West coast north of Mumbai in the Arabia Sea), on the Gulf of Cambay (Khambhat now) played a central role until at least the Seventeenth Century for more than 4500 years (before the migration of Hindu Aryans to India). From The Indian Ocean by Michael Pearson:

"By the end of the [Sixteenth] century Surat was the greatest market in India, in the Indian ocean, and indeed maybe the whole world. Here we found the fabulously wealthy Hindu and Jain [a tiny minority in India, close to 1% of the total population] communities which so many Europeans wrote of so admiringly. Here also were found products from all over the world, including those that the Portuguese [the first colonizers in Africa, India and East Asia, but only along the coast and in port cities] hoped to monopolize. There was a host of merchant communities: not only Hindus and Jains (and these anyway were often subdivided into castes or to economic specialty) but also Armenians [also a diaspora community at the time], Jews, Portuguese, and Muslims from Persia and Turkey."

 

Not long after the British East India Company arrived in India to Trade and set up a facility in Surat, one Jain trader in Surat, Virji Vora (or Vohra, other variations are Bohra and Bhora, all meaning creditor) was the largest trader in the world, as per the British sources, and he amassed so much wealth from trading that he was also the biggest moneylender to the Mogul emperors, the Dutch East India Company and the English East India Company. He was one of the wealthiest men, perhaps the wealthiest private individual, in the world at the time. The old style capitalism was thriving in Arabia, East Asia, India, Persia and South East Asia before the arrival of Vasco de Gamma. There was another very wealthy Hindu trading community of Chettiars in South India, along the East coast, that made money from trading with the East while the wealthy Gujratis like Vora made money from trading with the West and North, all the way to Europe via intermediaries.

Jas

Monday, July 26, 2010

Jas Jain Still Recommending Long Bonds

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC: "the big [investment] surprise for the year is..." by David Rosenberg
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:58:32 -0700
From: Jas Jain

David Rosenberg (my emphasis): "the big surprise for the year is that we are seven months into it and the bond market has smoked equities in terms of generating a total return for investors – and with a lot less volatility. Indeed – long-dated zero coupon bonds have really been the place to be with a juicy net return of 21% year-to-date (nifty WSJ article on this) – and yet the typical institutional investor right now is sitting 68% in equities! Now what's that all about?"
 
It is not a coincidence that Rosenberg in not a born-and-bred American dope. How many born-and-bred American dopes have been in the "long-dated zero coupon bonds?" And how many still hold investments related to Scams?? I hope that I have made my point about the dopes who are more than ignorant about investments--they have been trained to feeds the Crooks. Crooks and dopes are codependents! 
Jas

US Treasury Rate Quotes
TNX (10 YR) = 3.00%
TYX (30 YR) = 4.03%


“compressive deflationary contraction” by Kunstler


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC: "compressive deflationary contraction" by Kunstler
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:23:21 -0700
From: Jas Jain


Communicating with born-and-bred American dopes about the plain fact that America, and the world made along American econo-political lines, is in deep sh*t from which it cannot come out of under the current system of the Crooks is a talent that only some possess. Maybe, Mr. Kunstler has better skills.

 

It is hard for a born-and-bred American dope to come to terms with the reality that vast majority are economic, intellectual and political slaves as a result of the lifelong brainwashing about the American system, or Americanism. The fact remains that America has a doped population, bad leaders (crooks, i.e., liars and cheaters) and bad priests (economists and political "scientists," including the talking heads on radio and TV). Just like the corporate crooks and politicians, economists have taken to lying because that is what born-and-bred American dopes reward. "The American People love to be lied to," according to a Madison Ave. executive. Propagandists know the dopes! They created them!! Dope want constant pandering and criticism of those that they consider "others." The dopes, from the top to the bottom, are experts at the blame game. At some point the game would get real ugly.

Jas

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

http://kunstler.com/blog/2010/07/what-is-it.html

What Is It?

     The New York Times ran a story of curious import this morning: "Mel Gibson Loses Support Abroad." Well, gosh, that's disappointing.  And just when we needed him, too. Concern over this pressing matter probably reflects the general mood of the nation these dog days of summer - and these soggy days, indeed, are like living in a dog's mouth - so no wonder the USA has lost its mind, as evidenced by the fact that so many people who ought to know better, in the immortal words of Jim Cramer, don't know anything.

     Case in point: I visited the Slate Political Gabfest podcast yesterday. These otherwise excellent, entertaining, highly educated folk (David Plotz, Emily Bazelon, and Daniel Gross, in for vacationing John Dickerson) were discussing the ramifications of the economic situation on the upcoming elections. They were quite clear about not being able to articulate the nature of this economic situation, "...this recession, or whatever you want to call it..." in Ms. Bazelon's words.  What's the point of sending these people to Ivy League colleges if they can't make sense of their world.

     Let's call this whatever-you-want-to-call-it a compressive deflationary contraction, because that's exactly what it is, an accelerating systemic collapse of activity due to over-investments in hyper-complexity (thank you John Tainter). A number of things are going on in our society that can be described with precision. We've generated too many future claims on wealth that does not exist and has poor prospects of ever being generated. That's what unpayable debt is. We have such a mighty mountain of it that the Federal Reserve can "create" new digital dollars until the cows come home (and learn how to play chamber music), but they will never create enough new money to outpace the disappearance of existing notional money in the form of welshed-on loans. Hence, money will continue to disappear out of the economic system indefinitely, citizens will grow poorer steadily, companies will go out of business, and governments at all levels will not have money to do what they have been organized to do.

     This compressive deflationary collapse is not the kind of cyclical "downturn" that we are familiar with during the two-hundred-year-long adventure with industrial expansion - that is, the kind of cyclical downturn caused by the usual exhalations of markets attempting to adjust the flows of supply and demand. This is a structural implosion of markets that have been functionally destroyed by pervasive fraud and swindling in the absence of real productive activity. 

     The loss of productive activity preceded the fraud and swindling beginning in the 1960s when other nations recovered from the traumas of the world wars and started to out-compete the USA in the production of goods. Personally, I doubt this was the result of any kind of conspiracy, but rather a comprehensible historical narrative that worked to America's disadvantage. Tough noogies for us. The fatal trouble began when we attempted to compensate for this loss of value-creation by ramping up the financial sector to a credit orgy so that every individual and every enterprise and every government could enjoy ever-increasing levels of wealth in a system that no longer really produced wealth.

     This was accomplished in the financial sector by "innovating" new tradable securities based on getting something for nothing. That is what the aggregate mischief on Wall Street and its vassal operations was all about.  The essence of the fraud was the "securitization" of debt, because the collateral was either inadequate or altogether missing. That's how you get something for nothing. The swindling came in when these worthless certificates were pawned off on credulous "marks" such as pension funds and other assorted investors.

            Tragically, everybody in a position to object to these shenanigans failed to issue any warnings or ring the alarm bells - and this includes the entire matrix of adult authority in banking, government (including the law), academia, and a hapless news media. Everyone pretended that the orgy of mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt and loan obligations, structured investment vehicles, collateralized debt obligations, and other chimeras of capital amounted to things of real value.

     Certainly the editors and pundits in the media simply didn't understand the rackets they undertook to report. You can bet that the players on Wall Street made every effort to mystify the media with arcane language, and they succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. (Making multiple billions of dollars by trading worthless certificates based on getting something for nothing must be the ultimate definition of succeeding beyond one's wildest dreams.) It's harder to account for the dimness of the news media. I doubt they were in on the caper. More likely there is a correlation between their low pay and their low capacity. But I wouldn't discount the fog of assumptions and expectations about the way the world is supposed to work that can disable even people of intelligence.

     I'm as certain as the day is long that the folks on Wall Street, from the myrmidons in the trading pits to the demigods like John Thain, with his thousand-dollar trash basket, knew that they were trafficking in tainted paper. Many of them deserve to be locked up in the federal penitentiary for years on end, and they probably never will because president Barack Obama lacked the courage to set the dogs of justice after them and now it is too late.

     The most confused of any putative authorities are the academic economists, lost in the wilderness of their models and equations and their quaint expectations of the way things ought to go if you can tweak numbers. These are the people who believe with the faith of little children that if you can measure anything you can control it. They will go down in history as the greatest convocation of clowns ever assembled, surpassing all the collected alchemists, priests, and vizeers employed in the 1500 years following the fall of Rome.

     It's harder to tell whether the elected officials and their appointees in sensitive places like the Securities and Exchange Commission and the FBI had a clue as to the scale of misconduct in the financial sector, or if they were bought off plain and simple, or just too stupid to understand what was going on all around them. The term "regulatory capture" provides valuable insight. How could Christopher Cox at the SEC fail to notice the stupendous malfeasance in the mortgage-related securities rackets. Why isn't he working for fifty cents a day in the laundry of Allenwood Federal Correctional Facility? Why is the grifter of Countrywide mortgage favors, Christopher Dodd, still free to guzzle the fabled bean soup in the Senate lunch room? I could go on in this vein for two hundred pages, but you get the drift.

     The collective failure of authority, whether of intention or oversight or mental deficiency boggles the mind. And it leaves us where we are: in a compressive deflationary contraction, a.k.a. the long emergency.  This is not a cyclical recession. It's the end of one thing and the beginning of another thing, another phase of history in which people will have to learn to live differently or perish. I'm convinced that just about very elected official who can be swept out of office will be swept out of office - even if their replacements turn out to be a very unsavory gang of sadists and morons who will certainly make things worse.

     But these dog days of summer nobody will be paying attention, even as the markets themselves roll over and puke, as I rather imagine they will between now and Halloween, if not next week.

     P.S. I have not come to any conclusions about the fate of the Macondo blow-out and the claims of Matthew Simmons, though I have certainly got a lot of mail about it, some of it very intelligent. The BP oil spill has vanished from the news headlines again as the world waits for the final push at the relief wells. We do know that we are entering the heart of the hurricane season and that will make for some excitement.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Fwd: FWC: Stress-testing Europe's banks won't stave off a deflationary vortex

New Posts:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC: Stress-testing Europe's banks won't stave off a deflationary vortex
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:13:38 -0700
From: Jas Jain

FWC: Stress-testing Europe's banks won't stave off a deflationary vortex

 

"The Fed has allowed M3 money to contract at a 10pc pace for much of this year - the Great Depression rate. The economy has hit the wall with the usual lag. Textbook stuff. Never ignore the quantity theory of money."

As I said in 2006, Bernanke is impotent when it comes to fighting deflation in the US. I said again and gain that the Fly Zone for his Helicopter is restricted to Bankrupters and Fraudsters of New York City. Only dopes bought Bernanke's promise to not let Deflation Happen Here. I bet that Bernanke is already thinking about whom to blame the depression on. Europe? China?? Just like any born-and-bred American dope would do. The coming depression has everything to do with American Crooks and dopes. No other country is to blame.

 

"It's Weimar, all right: circa 1931, not 1923."

Holy moly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jas

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/7897304/Stress-testing-Europes-banks-wont-stave-off-a-deflationary-vortex.html

 

Stress-testing Europe's banks won't stave off a deflationary vortex

Euroland's authorities are inflicting a triple shock of fiscal, monetary, and currency tightening on a broken economy. They are doing so in a region where industrial output is still 14pc below its peak, where growth barely scraped above zero over the winter "recovery", and where youth unemployment is at 40pc in Spain, 35pc in Slovakia, 29pc in Italy, and 26pc in Ireland.

 

They seem unaware that China is slowing and the US is tipping into a second leg of the Long Slump. Last week's collapse in America's ECRI leading indicator to -9.8 marks the end of the V-shaped rebound. If this means what it normally means - recession within three months - Europe must take immediate action to prevent being drawn into a deflationary vortex. Spiralling public debt precludes further Keynesian spending, so this must come from central bank stimulus. Tight fiscal policy offset by ultra-loose money is the only option for Europe, the US, and Japan.

No student of Milton Friedman is surprised by the US relapse. The Fed has allowed M3 money to contract at a 10pc pace for much of this year - the Great Depression rate. The economy has hit the wall with the usual lag. Textbook stuff. Never ignore the quantity theory of money.
The US Conference Board's indicator is not yet flashing a red alert, but that is because it gives weight to "yield curve inversion", where long rates fall below short rates. This indicator is meaningless in a Japan-style bust where policy rates are zero.
I suspect that Fed chair Ben Bernanke knows the economy buckled around the Ides of June, but is stymied by hawks at the regional Feds. All he can do for now is to talk down credit costs through hints of more quantitative easing, or QE2. In this he has succeeded. The yield on two-year Treasuries fell to an all-time low of 0.5765pc on Friday. It's Weimar, all right: circa 1931, not 1923.
...

Thursday, July 22, 2010

The Fed's toughest foe: Deflation

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC -- The Fed's toughest foe: Deflation
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:56:32 -0700
From: Jas Jain

The Fed's toughest foe: Deflation

"One of the biggest worries among economists is that fighting deflation is much tougher than turning back inflation."

And we have a proven loser as the field marshal. Fighting deflation is like fight the Good and that is what evildoers like Bernanke are there for. Trust me, nothing can save the US economy from the baked-in-the-cake Greater Depression. Of course, it would be deflationary depression.

 

"Mark Thoma, economics professor at the University of Oregon, said short of Bernanke's facetious suggestion back in 2003 that the Fed should drop money from helicopters, getting people spending again is beyond Fed's control."

I have a definitive proof that Mark Thoma is a moron, but he is right in the above statement. I am sorry, but the economics profession in the US is full of crooks' agents, evildoers (when they have power) and morons. That is what is supposed to happen in the system of the Crooks, by the Crooks and for the Crooks and a nation full of born-and-bred dopes in the areas of economics, investments and political system.

Jas

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

http://money.cnn.com/2010/07/20/news/economy/fed_deflation/?postversion=2010072110

 

In 2009 Vanguard's TIPS fund, VIPSX, gained 10.8%
In 2009 Vanguard's GNMA fund, VFIIX, gained 5.3%

For 2010 through the first half (6/30/10)
Vanguard's TIPS fund, VIPSX, gained 4.28%
Vanguard's GNMA fund, VFIIX, gained 5.43%

The Fed's toughest foe: Deflation

By Chris Isidore, senior writerJuly 21, 2010: 5:16 PM ET

 

 

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Battling inflation has historically been a major aim of the Federal Reserve. But central bank policymakers now have an even bigger worry: deflation.

 

Prices have been slowing for three months. And members of the Federal Reserve openly voiced concerns about deflation at their last meeting

The Fed now expects inflation of 1% or less this year and next, not including food and energy prices.

While spending less on purchases may sound appealing to consumers, falling prices and wages can cause much more economic pain than rising prices.

Businesses respond to declines in prices by cutting output and jobs. Why invest in making something to sell if the price you'll get for it will drop? Consumers hold back on buying for the same reason. The result is a downward spiral that can bring about a depression in a worst case scenario, or a prolonged period of economic stagnation, in the best case.

"It isn't that inflation in itself is a good thing. It's that the low inflation is a symptom of too little demand," said Scott Sumner, economics professor at Bentley University.

One of the biggest worries among economists is that fighting deflation is much tougher than turning back inflation.

With its key interest rate already near 0% for the last 18 months, the Fed can't cut rates to spur the economy.

Until a couple of months ago, most experts assumed the Fed's next step would be to raise rates in order to reduce the risk of inflation. The central bank's next moves are now less clear.

"There's a tried and true policy response to inflation -- raise interest rates and eventually you'll win," said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Analytics. "We haven't had a lot of bouts with deflation, but in those battles, central banks have never won in a clear-cut way."

Sitting on the sidelines

In testimony Wednesday Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said that while he believed inflation would be in check for the foreseeable future, he wasn't particularly worried about deflation taking hold.

But others argue the Fed has to be prepared to take unprecedented steps to spur economic activity and move prices higher, especially since Congress appears unwilling to pump more money into the economy and add to record deficits.

The Fed has traditionally been thought to favor an annual inflation rate close to 2%. Sumner recommends that the Fed set a target of 3%, which he said would signal to both investors and individuals that now is time to spend before prices go up.

According to Sumner, one of the biggest problems is that banks are hoarding too much cash. Banks are required to keep a certain amount of cash in reserve accounts at their local Federal Reserve bank. But right now they collectively have $1 trillion in excess reserves in those accounts. That's partly because the banks are worried about the economy and the ability of borrowers to repay loans. But the Fed also encourages them to do so by paying them 0.25% interest.

He suggests the Fed follow the lead of the Swedish central bank last year and establish a negative interest rate on those excess reserves, charging banks to keep excess cash, rather than paying them. That could encourage banks to push money out the door.

 

Other economists argue the problem isn't banks' willingness to lend, but rather weak demand because of the recession.

Mark Thoma, economics professor at the University of Oregon, said short of Bernanke's facetious suggestion back in 2003 that the Fed should drop money from helicopters, getting people spending again is beyond Fed's control.

"It's easy to choke off demand," he said. "But you can create all the incentives to spend you want, and it won't necessarily work."

Some are looking for the Fed to start pumping more money into the system by resuming purchases of mortgages and long-term treasuries as it did in 2009. It could even expand the assets it would purchase.

Zandi believes the Fed is looking at new steps it could take if deflation starts to take hold, including charging banks for excess reserves and purchases of new classes of assets, such as corporate debt and even stocks.

"Presumably they're thinking about these scenarios, thinking the unthinkable," he said. "Given what we're facing, it's a reasonable thing to do."



* in 2009 Vanguard's TIPS fund, VIPSX, gained 10.8%
* in 2009 Vanguard's GNMA fund, VFIIX, gained 5.3%

For 2010 through the first half (6/30/10)
Vanguard's TIPS fund, VIPSX, gained 4.28%
Vanguard's GNMA fund, VFIIX, gained 5.43%

Addendum -- What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Addendum -- What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:00:00 -0700
From: Jas Jain 


Addendum -- What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?

I could add ten more items as to the conditions that gave rise to power of the German Nazis, but that is not my intention, as I like to keep my commentaries brief and just cover important points. However, I missed a very important point. That is, the rise of the radical left element within Germany apart from the threat of Communism posed by the Russian Revolution of 1917. These radicals are motivated to radically change the society as it has existed for a long time and challenge the long established traditions, including the religion of the majority. They are never content with the way things are, or with changes made slowly, and have an attitude of change for the sake of change and change now.  Obama is the most recent example of a radical in American politics. Obama's election on the main promise of Change exposed ignorance and immaturity of the American voters more than ever before. They fall for the false promise of change for the better, which is rare. Other notable radicals in news are Paul Krugman and Elena Kagan, both are more like Communists but have taken the garb of socialism, or liberal, or progressive, because Communism is no longer popular among Americans and one would get very little support. Many of the former Communists, or leftist radicals, in America turned into neo-cons, in politics, and neo-Keynesians in economics. Economics profession, as it relates to the public policy, is dominated by habitual liars, or manipulators, Greenspan and Bernanke being fine examples. "Oh, but I couldn't have known" is how these liars explain their major failures that many had fully known and warned about.

 

The system of the Crooks in America is operated by liars, both on the left and on the right. I don't know the current state of radicalism in India, but America is infested with radical left at the top levels of economics and politics. The danger of the reaction against it is far greater when minorities form the dominant part of the radical element, left or right. On the other side of the isle, Republicans had major boobs as Presidents in Reagan and GW Bush. Obama is reaction to the bad economic policies under the later boob. Yeah, yeah, tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts. Aren't Americans easy dopes when it comes to choosing a President? The two parties work very hard to breed dopes, at a young age, and then keep them doped. Propagandist Rush Limbaugh makes a good income doing that. Doping, or propaganda, is one of the best businesses in America to make money and gain fame. The ground could not have been better prepared for a Hitler like leader to be elected the President once the depression, very likely to be the worst in US history, cannot be pushed farther into the future as Bernanke & Co are desperately trying to do with short-term policies that aren't working. This should also give you an idea as to why Krugman is so worried. Depression is coming to America, coming to India, and both countries are prime candidates for Nazi-like (nationalistic, rightwing) regimes. Sorry, I don't have a solution, as someone has asked, and I am not in the solutions business. I leave fantasies to others. People should focus on personal issues under the conditions that I foresee.

Jas

 

------------------------------------------------------

Something for Americans and Indians to Ponder: What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?

1. Democracy! Under no other form of govt would Nazis have gained political power in Germany.

2. "Communist" threat!! Is there a large Communist country that poses economic and political threat to these two "democracies?"

3. Reaction against the bankers and financiers, especially, against those fanning speculation via stocks and commodities exchanges at the expense of the producer class, specially, the working class. In particular, German intellectuals were against the Anglo-American system that was controlled by the moneyed interests at the expense of all other interests including the lives lost in wars fought for the sake of "moneybags," e.g., the Boar War. Historically, the control of the govt passed from the landed and military aristocracy to the moneyed interests of traders and industrialists to bankers and financiers, exemplified by Rothschilds in England and J.P. Morgan in the US. Over the past 15 years, the bankers and financiers in the US have turned into pure crooks by introducing widespread fraud into the system itself. With the control of the govt and the regulators these banking and finance crooks were able to turn what were essentially fraudulent activities (I warned so at the time!) into legal activities, which in the case of American legalism is anything that is not strictly prohibited is by definition legal, or allowable. This leaves door wide open for financial innovation whose real harmful nature people don't find out until after the damage has been done. The Crooks go scot-free.

4. Economic depression, as the Great Depression in the US spread to Europe.

5. Large number of dissatisfied people among the majority, especially, material, or economic, dissatisfaction, but also the feeling of an ineffective government. The majority in the case of the US is white Christians and in the case of India it is the "upper" caste (excluding the untouchables) Hindus. The politically correct environment in the two countries is a horrendous practice that exacerbates the dissatisfaction of the majority.

6. Diversity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thorstein Veblen, a famous American sociologist, predicted troubles in Germany based on the greater diversity of the population in terms of cultural habits and temperament. I can list, but I would not!, at least six significant groups whose temperaments and cultural values are sufficiently different. Some of these groups insist on playing by different rules! America is ripe for ethnic explosion because of the imprudence of certain politically active minorities. Ethnic politics in America is growing because it pays! Obama is a big beneficiary.

7. New electronic media, i.e., radio that was used in propaganda that is central to success in a democracy, especially for a charismatic personality. Now, of course, we have not only the TV but also the Internet. Things have never been better for a charismatic figure, a demagogue. There is nothing like bad times to bring a charismatic leader to the fore, especially, in very large population countries like America and India. America and India are too big to be able to correct the multifaceted problems that affect different geographies and different groups disproportionately and in different ways. Central Planning is more likely to fail in a larger country than in a smaller country. Big is ugly!!!

 

Now that all the govt interventions to postpone the long awaited depression (depressions, like recessions, are part of the modern capitalistic system) are due to exhaust themselves within a few short years the Made-In-USA, once again!, Greater Depression would engulf the world economies. This is more so because the American banking and finance system has been copied by India and many other countries. Most importantly, the system has been controlled by the crooks who have already cashed out trillions of dollars with the households and taxpayers laden with debt. Crooks have no incentive to risk their trillions and they can easily take that capital to any country that they feel safe in and leave the rest high and dry. It is a sad commentary on those Americans who are proud of the current system, and show that pride by voting election after election after election, and in essence agree to be ruled by liars and cheaters. That is what lifelong brainwashing can do to an otherwise intelligent person.

 

The reasons listed above more or less guarantee that Nazi-like (not the same as the German Nazis) regimes are likely to come to power in America and India via the vote once the global depression sets in. Actually, there is a working model now in existence that would be copied closely! I would cover this in the next commentary on this subject. Prepare for safety as best as your circumstance permits. Forewarned is forearmed!

Jas

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Hussman on investors taken for suckers + Don't Take the Bait

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FWC: Hussman on investors taken for suckers + Don't Take the Bait
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:54:17 -0700
From: Jas Jain

FWC: Hussman on investors taken for suckers + Don't Take the Bait

AS (my emphasis): "Hussman is spot on, the stock market has become a giant scam.  A grab bag for fraudsters and corporate insiders.   Hussman is pitifully late in coming to that conclusion though.  He's also unable to let go of the past as he is still "investing" in stocks.   Even worse, Hussman has been a commodities bull based on ballooning reserves and the inflation he thinks they will cause.  Only now is Hussman starting to grasp deflation and depression. 

"As educated as Hussman is, he has some seriously flawed logic.  He admits the stock market is ridden with fraud, yet believes he won't get scammed.   He complains about the bailouts, yet without the bailouts, his stock "investments" would be worth far less (even with his hedges). 

"Over the past five years, investors in Hussman's Growth Fund are underwater after fees and taxes.  The losses extend even further back when inflation is factored in and the fund is less than 10 years old.   And here's the thing, the majority of the money Hussman manages in the growth fund was received in the past five years.  It's very likely that Hussman's growth fund, in aggregate, has lost more money than it has gained.  And the gains in the early years were very likely a chance event as the fund came into existence during the dot.com bust when bargains could be found and the Fed got stupid with policy giving all stocks a boost. 

"Hussman doesn't want to admit that you can't compete with stupidity.  If he did, he'd have to admit that he has been a dupe for years.  Most people, especially the highly educated, can't ever acknowledge that they were duped.  Their egos just can't handle it.

 

Thanks. If one has the skills, very expensive to acquire!, one should bet against stupidity! But, it is a dangerous game. My advice since 1998, when I concluded that the old US stock market had been converted into the Scam Market, has been to avoid Scams. I apologize for bruising American egos (American egos need lot more than bruising; they need to be hammered non-stop!) but there is no greater disability in understanding the American economy, investments and political system than being a born-and-bred American. It is a deep hole to crawl out of. And Hussman is no exception.

Jas

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

Hussman on investors taken for suckers

On the surface, we observe consumers that have borrowed far beyond their actual incomes to consume output, while corporations have booked what appear to be strong profits. Financial companies, in particular, have contributed a disproportionately large share of S&P 500 profits over the past decade, and have been the primary drivers of observed profit recovery over the past year. Below the surface, however, an increasingly large fraction of reported profits has been written off as "extraordinary charges" due to credit losses and writeoffs of bad investments. Reported "operating earnings" have been substantially above the amounts that have actually been delivered to shareholders, either through dividends, increases in book value, or share repurchases in excess of grants to insiders.

Think about this for a moment. Since the late 1990's, many employees have earned paychecks for producing capital goods that did not turn out to be worth what companies spent, and consumers have received loans for amounts which they are not actually able to repay. Both of these outcomes have been the economy's way of forcing a large but rather overlooked "correction" in the income distribution back from corporate profits (and by extension shareholders) and toward the average American worker.

All of this is extraordinarily inefficient, because some people have effectively received windfalls (for example, those who sold their homes at the top of the real estate bubble, and those who have defaulted on large amounts of consumer credit), while other hard-working people have been stiffed. But one way or another, the equilibrium outcome of the economy has been to ensure - whether the transfer of purchasing power was voluntary or not - that American workers were able to purchase the output that was actually produced by the economy.

What's fascinating about this, however, is that shareholders are still ignoring it. They also ignore the large percentage of reported earnings that are actually quietly distributed to corporate insiders through the issuance of stock and options. They blindly accept that "share repurchases" are somehow a pleasant distribution of earnings, whereas the majority of share repurchases are actually made by companies to do nothing more than offset the dilution from stock shares and options granted to insiders. A good question to ask in the years ahead, immediately after profits are reported, is "how much of this figure is actually delivered to shareholders?" If you've been attentive over the past decade, the answer turns out to be much closer to the dividend yield than to the operating earnings yield that companies have reported.

For a moment, at least, it is good to be a corporate insider, particularly at major financial companies. First, you get to report productivity gains and "operating profits" - not by making smart investments in productive assets, but instead by writing up debt thanks to Treasury intervention, by misstating your balance sheet thanks to FASB changes last year, and at industrial firms, by cutting the number of workers per unit of capital. Next, you quietly write off large losses on bad investments and unrecoverable loans as "extraordinary expenses," to which investors pay no notice. And to add insult to injury, you deliver a significant portion of the remaining profits to yourself as "incentive compensation," followed by buybacks of stock to offset the dilution, which investors actually cheer because they don't realize they've been taken for suckers.

-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-

Hussman: Don't Take the Bait

Investors who allow Wall Street to convince them that stocks are generationally cheap at current levels are like trout - biting down on the enticing but illusory bait of operating earnings, unaware of the hook buried inside.

I continue to urge investors to have wide skepticism for valuation metrics built on forward operating earnings and other measures that implicitly require U.S. profit margins to sustain levels about 50% above their historical norms indefinitely. Forward operating earnings are Wall Street's estimates of next year's earnings, omitting a whole range of actual charges such as loan losses, bad investments, restructuring charges, and the like. The ratio of forward operating earnings to S&P 500 revenues is now higher than it has ever been. Based on historical data (see August 20, 2007 Long Term Evidence on the Fed Model and Forward Operating P/E Ratios), the profit margin assumptions built into forward operating earnings are well beyond two standard deviations above the long-run norm. This is largely because, as Bill Hester noted in his research article last week, forward operating earnings are heavily determined by extrapolating the most recent year-over-year growth rate for earnings. In the current instance, this is likely to overshoot reality, and in any event, has little to do with the long-term cash flows that investors can actually expect to receive over time.

I can't emphasize enough that when you hear an analyst say "stocks are cheap based on forward operating earnings" it would be best to replace that phrase in your head with "stocks are cheap based on Wall Street's extrapolative estimates of a misleading number."

More sober and historically reliable measures of market valuation create a much more challenging picture. Apart from our own measures, which indicate continued overvaluation, there are several good indicators of market valuation that are not overly sensitive to year-to-year fluctuations in profit margins. One is based on the 10-year average of actual net (not operating) earnings, which is advocated by economist Robert Shiller, and another is Tobin's "q" ratio which is based on comparing market value to replacement cost, and is advocated by Andrew Smithers. Both of these measures largely agree with our own measures, both presently and on a historical basis. Based on last week's valuations, both suggest that the S&P 500 is substantially overvalued.

Something for Americans and Indians to Ponder: What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?

Disclaimer:  REMEMBER, this post below is not mine.  It is all by Jas Jain.
I'd sure like to hear what Mr Jain proposes as a SOLUTION.    Some of us voted for or supported Libertarian Ron Paul who has been vocal about the problems faced in the US but in California, that is like peeing in the ocean to make the tide rise faster.
ANY fool can bash the government in the US (and most of them do) but it takes real genius and courage to try and make positive change.
Kirk

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Something for Americans and Indians to Ponder: What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:58:50 -0700
From: Jas Jain

Something for Americans and Indians to Ponder: What Conditions Gave Rise to Power of the German Nazis?

1. Democracy! Under no other form of govt would Nazis have gained political power in Germany.

2. "Communist" threat!! Is there a large Communist country that poses economic and political threat to these two "democracies?"

3. Reaction against the bankers and financiers, especially, against those fanning speculation via stocks and commodities exchanges at the expense of the producer class, specially, the working class. In particular, German intellectuals were against the Anglo-American system that was controlled by the moneyed interests at the expense of all other interests including the lives lost in wars fought for the sake of "moneybags," e.g., the Boar War. Historically, the control of the govt passed from the landed and military aristocracy to the moneyed interests of traders and industrialists to bankers and financiers, exemplified by Rothschilds in England and J.P. Morgan in the US. Over the past 15 years, the bankers and financiers in the US have turned into pure crooks by introducing widespread fraud into the system itself. With the control of the govt and the regulators these banking and finance crooks were able to turn what were essentially fraudulent activities (I warned so at the time!) into legal activities, which in the case of American legalism is anything that is not strictly prohibited is by definition legal, or allowable. This leaves door wide open for financial innovation whose real harmful nature people don't find out until after the damage has been done. The Crooks go scot-free.

4. Economic depression, as the Great Depression in the US spread to Europe.

5. Large number of dissatisfied people among the majority, especially, material, or economic, dissatisfaction, but also the feeling of an ineffective government. The majority in the case of the US is white Christians and in the case of India it is the "upper" caste (excluding the untouchables) Hindus. The politically correct environment in the two countries is a horrendous practice that exacerbates the dissatisfaction of the majority.

6. Diversity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thorstein Veblen, a famous American sociologist, predicted troubles in Germany based on the greater diversity of the population in terms of cultural habits and temperament. I can list, but I would not!, at least six significant groups whose temperaments and cultural values are sufficiently different. Some of these groups insist of playing by different rules! America is ripe for ethnic explosion because of the imprudence of certain politically active minorities. Ethnic politics in America is growing because it pays! Obama is a big beneficiary.

7. New electronic media, i.e., radio that was used in propaganda that is central to success in a democracy, especially for a charismatic personality. Now, of course, we have not only the TV but also the Internet. Things have never been better for a charismatic figure, a demagogue. There is nothing like bad times to bring a charismatic leader to the fore, especially, in very large population countries like America and India. America and India are too big to be able to correct the multifaceted problems that affect different geographies and different groups disproportionately and in different ways. Central Planning is more likely to fail in a larger country than in a smaller country. Big is ugly!!!

 

Now that all the govt interventions to postpone the long awaited depression (depressions, like recessions, are part of the modern capitalistic system) are due to exhaust themselves within a few short years the Made-In-USA, once again!, Greater Depression would engulf the world economies. This is more so because the American banking and finance system has been copied by India and many other countries. Most importantly, the system has been controlled by the crooks who have already cashed out trillions of dollars with the households and taxpayers laden with debt. Crooks have no incentive to risk their trillions and they can easily take that capital to any country that they feel safe in and leave the rest high and dry. It is a sad commentary on those Americans who are proud of the current system, and show that pride by voting election after election after election, and in essence agree to be ruled by liars and cheaters. That is what lifelong brainwashing can do to an otherwise intelligent person.

 

The reasons listed above more or less guarantee that Nazi-like (not the same as the German Nazis) regimes are likely to come to power in America and India via the vote once the global depression sets in. Actually, there is a working model now in existence that would be copied closely! I would cover this in the next commentary on this subject. Prepare for safety as best as your circumstance permits. Forewarned is forearmed!

Jas




Suggested Reading


=>Article: How to Get the Best CD Rates
=>Article: Beware of Annuities
=>Info: Best Mortgage Loan Rates